You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are there any tests against the SciPy LM implementation to see if this implementation is as robust as possible (assuming the SciPy implementation is good)? I can't seem to find out how to properly use PyCall to use the SciPy curve_fit function, but I think it would be a necessary test since the current LM implementation is lacking a lot of robustness (and while that's a standard feature of the algorithm, it just seems even pickier than normal)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are there any tests against the SciPy LM implementation to see if this implementation is as robust as possible (assuming the SciPy implementation is good)? I can't seem to find out how to properly use PyCall to use the SciPy
curve_fit
function, but I think it would be a necessary test since the current LM implementation is lacking a lot of robustness (and while that's a standard feature of the algorithm, it just seems even pickier than normal)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: