Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Stopgap nonlinear printing #204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2014
Merged

RFC: Stopgap nonlinear printing #204

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2014

Conversation

joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

For #201: until we can unravel nonlinear expressions for printing, this just states that nonlinear constraints/objectives exist:

Max (nonlinear expression)
Subject to
1 nonlinear constraints
μ free
σ ≥ 0

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not going to add tests or anything because I hope this isn't a permanent solution.

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Jun 17, 2014

Do we not currently have any tests for printing nonlinear models? I'd say it's worth adding a simple one.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor Author

What would we test? I didn't add any new methods, just modified print/show for Model. I guess we could test that these work at all for nonlinear models.

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Jun 17, 2014

Just printing a basic nonlinear model, otherwise we don't have coverage for this code.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added.

joehuchette added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2014
RFC: Stopgap nonlinear printing
@joehuchette joehuchette merged commit 8c39591 into master Jun 17, 2014
@joehuchette joehuchette deleted the nl_print branch June 17, 2014 19:28
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.41%) when pulling 64287db on nl_print into 417013a on master.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, coveralls!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants