Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup printing for UnionAll in requirements #151

Open
zsunberg opened this issue Jul 11, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Cleanup printing for UnionAll in requirements #151

zsunberg opened this issue Jul 11, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@zsunberg
Copy link
Member

To get the tests to pass, we did a little workaround for printing UnionAll types in requirements_printing line 56. For example, we didn't remove the module name, and we're not sure what will happen if you specify one parameter but not the others (e.g. POMDP{Int}). This should be cleaned up.

@zsunberg zsunberg added the linter label Jun 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant