Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SHA256 for MicroMamba 0.27.0 artifact on linux x86-64 is wrong #9

Closed
kshyatt opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

SHA256 for MicroMamba 0.27.0 artifact on linux x86-64 is wrong #9

kshyatt opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@kshyatt
Copy link

kshyatt commented Oct 27, 2022

I'm getting a hash mismatch. When I download the tarball and shasum it myself I get "1b1bdd07..." rather than "4adbf3091a4159af2c48264a8e32ecb98147b0e3f200601f384f8f53a6910ca2"

@giordano
Copy link

CC @cjdoris (since you aren't watching the repository). This is probably not your fault (it'd appear the upstream tarballs have been changed in-place, which is bad), but this is breaking many downstream packages.

@Lightup1
Copy link

On windows

┌ Error: Hash Mismatch!
│   Expected sha256:   358de7998dc768d3db44f1ac0791a39c73c068920fa618849633ec183f2ab380
│   Calculated sha256: 8f494ee2b6e6e36a9e81a3b764cf180adb6ad61d1e7901168c44d8a9e2f2ce83

@Lightup1
Copy link

I'm currently using pythoncall and there is an error like this.

@kshyatt
Copy link
Author

kshyatt commented Oct 30, 2022

@Lightup1 can you see if my PR fixes your issue?

@Lightup1
Copy link

@kshyatt Your PR works on my case!
Nice!

@ericphanson
Copy link

I propose we yank MicroMamba v0.1.10 from General, as a workaround to this issue. That doesn’t really address the core problem (unstable URLs) but does work around it, bc 0.1.9 only has older releases of MicroMamba who’s URLs have not changed (and probably won’t for awhile since presumably they aren’t still building them?).

Bc currently the release is broken, and having MicroMamba v0.1.10 anywhere in your dependency tree breaks everything.

@cjdoris
Copy link
Collaborator

cjdoris commented Nov 17, 2022

Fixed now thanks. As a longer term solution, I'm going to use micromamba_jll instead of grabbing the executable straight from conda.

@cjdoris cjdoris closed this as completed Nov 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants