-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The function pretty_stats cannot read solver_specific flags #149
Comments
Hi @DoctorDro ! I tried to make a reproducible example and it seems to work! Note that you can access the solver specific fields directly
|
You are amazing! Thanks! I was missing the : in :is_convex on top of other things. Have a hard time understanding symbols and other goodies Julia has introduced. Different logic that I have to get used to. Is there any version of pretty_stats which writes the output on a file or so? |
Yes, you can pass an IOStream to pretty_stats: SolverBenchmark.jl/src/formats.jl Line 17 in 24571ff
Example: SolverBenchmark.jl/test/tables.jl Line 29 in 24571ff
|
@DoctorDro I close this as I think we answer your questions. I opened a new issue to add the missing info in the documentation. |
Dear all,
I am running benchmarks on some JuMP problems. Some of them are nonconvex and during the course of iterations I have a way of storing a nonconvex certificate. This however, is not standard and has to be stored in solver_specific flags using the commands:
However, I get an error when I try the following
Any ideas how the DataFrame could read whether the problem is convex or not ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: