Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extra commands #20

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Rudokhvist
Copy link
Contributor

added command !farm <BOT> to restart farm of bot with given name
added command !status all to get status of all running bots (also, don't forget to add !status <BOT> command to readme - just a remainder)
added command !redeem <BOT> <KEY> to redeem key to bot with given name
added multiple keys activation - if bot gets a list of keys separated by a newline, it would redeem it to all running bots (or to as many bots as keys provided). This needs extra testing, I only tried it once.
changed timeouts to 3 min - without this my main account is unable to get game with pending card. With this timeout it works always.
Also, unsure if I did everything the best way - I don't know C#, just learning it now, so please forgive me for crappy code. At least you can use it as an idea of feature.

added command !redeem <BOT> <KEY> - to redeem key to any bot by name.
added command !status all - show status of all running bots.
added activation of multiple keys - if any bot receives a list of newline separated keys it would activate them to all running bots (or to as many bots as keys provided).
changed timeouts to 3 min. - without this my main account is unable to get games to farm, with this timeout - works 100%.
@JustArchi
Copy link
Member

Uh, this code needs a major refactoring to be efficient and clean, maybe later I fix it up.

@JustArchi JustArchi added ✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🙏 Wishlist Issues marked with this label are wishlisted. We'd like to make them happen but they're not crucial. 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. labels Nov 25, 2015
@JustArchi JustArchi added ⛔ On hold Issues marked with this label are blocked from being worked on, very often due to third-parties. and removed 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. labels Dec 16, 2015
@JustArchi
Copy link
Member

Closing as requested.

@JustArchi JustArchi closed this Jan 5, 2016
@Rudokhvist Rudokhvist deleted the extracommands branch January 10, 2016 14:37
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. ⛔ On hold Issues marked with this label are blocked from being worked on, very often due to third-parties. 🙏 Wishlist Issues marked with this label are wishlisted. We'd like to make them happen but they're not crucial.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants