Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor, Documentation: There is no explanation of SHIP:STATUS #685

Closed
ZiwKerman opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #801
Closed

Minor, Documentation: There is no explanation of SHIP:STATUS #685

ZiwKerman opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #801
Labels
bug Weird outcome is probably not what the mod programmer expected. documentation Change the Sphinx user documents.

Comments

@ZiwKerman
Copy link
Contributor

In "Bound Variables" page STATUS is referred to SHIP:STATUS, but on Vessel page of the documentation there is no mention of it. In fact there is no mention of SHIP:STATUS anywhere else and it is never explained.

@erendrake erendrake added the documentation Change the Sphinx user documents. label Apr 2, 2015
@TDW89
Copy link
Contributor

TDW89 commented Apr 14, 2015

Was about to create documentation for this but noticed that ship:status doesn't work. I can print status. but I can't print ship:status. or print target:status..

@Dunbaratu Dunbaratu added the bug Weird outcome is probably not what the mod programmer expected. label Apr 14, 2015
@Dunbaratu
Copy link
Member

Added "bug" tag to reflect the fact that ship:status is missing.

@TDW89
Copy link
Contributor

TDW89 commented Apr 14, 2015

Thought I would add this here as its on the same doc page.
The table of suffixes is missing :TYPE it is however included in the detailed explanations below.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Weird outcome is probably not what the mod programmer expected. documentation Change the Sphinx user documents.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants