Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Procedural Avionics : Balance Issue(s) #679

Closed
ajvaughan opened this issue Jun 4, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Procedural Avionics : Balance Issue(s) #679

ajvaughan opened this issue Jun 4, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ajvaughan
Copy link

Comparing procedural avionics to the Able Avionics package (immediately after unlocking Early Avionics).
A procedural avionic unit at 800mm diameter and 100mm length (in booster config) is about 10% lighter, but less than half the cost (so you could easily save a few more kg by going to 70mm length). It has lower power consumption and battery storage, with both having roughly the same 2000 seconds of charge.

But the real issues are the Able costs 4000 to unlock and only supports 5 tonnes, whilst the procedural avionics is already unlocked, and supports 15 tonnes.

Unless someone objects, I'll report other balance issues in this same bug.

@rsparkyc
Copy link
Member

rsparkyc commented Jun 7, 2017

Yeah, this should be solved by adding unlock costs to procedural avionics, which i'm working on.
#677

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants