Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RUSTSEC-2024-0344: Timing variability in curve25519-dalek's Scalar29::sub/Scalar52::sub #47

Open
github-actions bot opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

Timing variability in curve25519-dalek's Scalar29::sub/Scalar52::sub

Details
Package curve25519-dalek
Version 2.1.3
URL dalek-cryptography/curve25519-dalek#659
Date 2024-06-18
Patched versions >=4.1.3

Timing variability of any kind is problematic when working with potentially secret values such as
elliptic curve scalars, and such issues can potentially leak private keys and other secrets. Such a
problem was recently discovered in curve25519-dalek.

The Scalar29::sub (32-bit) and Scalar52::sub (64-bit) functions contained usage of a mask value
inside a loop where LLVM saw an opportunity to insert a branch instruction (jns on x86) to
conditionally bypass this code section when the mask value is set to zero as can be seen in godbolt:

A similar problem was recently discovered in the Kyber reference implementation:

https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/hqbtIGFKIpU/m/cnE3pbueBgAJ

As discussed on that thread, one portable solution, which is also used in this PR, is to introduce a
volatile read as an optimization barrier, which prevents the compiler from optimizing it away.

The fix can be validated in godbolt here:

The problem was discovered and the solution independently verified by
Alexander Wagner <alexander.wagner@aisec.fraunhofer.de> and Lea Themint <lea.thiemt@tum.de> using
their DATA tool:

https://github.com/Fraunhofer-AISEC/DATA

See advisory page for additional details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants