Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KBS17-7 - Propargylation of 1,6-diaminohexane #32

Closed
KlementineJBS opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

KBS17-7 - Propargylation of 1,6-diaminohexane #32

KlementineJBS opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
linear amine repeat Repeat attempt of a reaction

Comments

@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner

KlementineJBS commented Sep 14, 2022

Link to HIRAC, original method and master page.

Last attempt is #28

Next attempt is #33

KBS17 Generic propargylation of 1,n-diamine.docx

Reaction Scheme

KBS17 hexadiamine

Using 1:5 mixture of DMF:THF as solvent.

Outcome

@KlementineJBS KlementineJBS added repeat Repeat attempt of a reaction linear amine labels Sep 14, 2022
@KlementineJBS KlementineJBS added this to To do in Open cyclam compounds via automation Sep 14, 2022
@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner Author

KlementineJBS commented Sep 14, 2022

14.09.22

  1. Added NaH (163.9 mg, 4.01 mmol, 3.23 equiv.) to a dry 50 mL flask under nitrogen
  2. Added KBS3-3 (401 mg, 1.27 mmol) by solution transfer (3 mL dry DMF + 15 mL dry THF)
  3. Allowed to stir for 15 minutes at rt. Reaction was grey.

  1. Added propargyl bromide (0.5 mL, 80% in toluene, 4.67 mmol, 3.6 equiv.) and left stirring from 5 pm. Reaction was pale yellow.

@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner Author

15.09.22

TLC'd reaction at 10 am. Looked much the same as yesterday.

Added more propargyl bromide (0.2 mL) at 11.30 am and TLC'd again at 3 pm against reference of double-substituted product.

LRMS indicated nothing was present in reaction mixture but SM (peak at 339 is [M+Na]+).

KBS17-7 RM 15-09-22.pdf

Decided to abandon reaction. Will quench and attempt to recover starting material.

Next attempt will follow original method more closely - add NaH portionwise (and use only 3 equiv.), allow 1-2 hrs reaction time and cool reaction to 0 C before adding propargyl bromide.

@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner Author

KlementineJBS commented Sep 19, 2022

19.09.22

Once again didn't actually quench and recover starting material - left over the weekend instead in the vague hope something would happen, and was pleasantly surprised.

TLC indicated that some of the desired bis-product has been produced.

R = reference spot of the bis-product. Eluent = 20:80 ethyl acetate:hexanes.\

  1. Slowly added 25 mL NH4Cl (sat.) and left stirring

  2. Diluted with 50 mL water extra

  3. Extracted with toluene (3 X 50 mL)

  4. Washed with water (5 X 100 mL)

  5. Washed with brine (125 mL)

  6. Dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated

Empty vial:

LRMS

KBS17-7 cr.d.zip
KBS17-7 cr.pdf

Peaks indicate SM (339.23, [M+Na]+), mono product (377.25, [M+Na]+ and desired bis product (415.26, [M+Na]+).

H NMR

Also indicates presence of both products.

KBS17-7 cr_1.zip
KBS17-7 cr processed.pdf

@KlementineJBS KlementineJBS changed the title KBS17-7 - Propargylationg of 1,6-diaminohexane KBS17-7 - Propargylation of 1,6-diaminohexane Sep 19, 2022
@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner Author

KlementineJBS commented Oct 18, 2022

17.10.22

Columned crude product manually with ~ 11 cm silica, ~2cm diameter column.

Loaded slurry with pet. benz. and ran in ethyl acetate:pet. benz (given as % ethyl acetate).

5% - 100 mL
10% - 100 mL
20% - 200 mL
30% - 100 mL
100% - 100 mL

All run in same solvent system, 20% ethyl acetate in pet. benz.

Code Fractions Tare weight Final weight Mass Percentage yield (see notes)
A 10-14 15.9227 15.9379 15.2 3%
B 15-18 15.7223 15.7398 17.5 4%
C 19-20 15.6540 15.6670 12.7 3%
D 21-25 15.9306 16.0197 89.1 23%
E 26-31 15.7982 15.9069 108.7 24%
F >32 15.7357 15.8434 107.7 27%

Total recovered yield: 84% by moles

For pure samples (B, D, F) - calculated moles according to m.w.
For mixed samples (C, E) - calculated moles according to m.w. of high m.w. component

@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner Author

KlementineJBS commented Oct 19, 2022

H NMR

A

KBS17-7 A processed.pdf
Uploading KBS17-7 A_1.zip…

No clear product, just "junk".

B

KBS17-7 B processed.pdf
KBS17-7 B_1.zip

Appears to be desired product albeit in low concentration.

C - E

As expected - C = mixed mono/bis product, D = mono product, E = mixed mono product/SM

KBS17-7 C_1.zip
KBS17-7 D_1.zip
KBS17-7 E_1.zip

KBS17-7 C-E processed.pdf

F

Perfect NMR spectrum of SM.

KBS17-7 F_1.zip
KBS17-7 F processed.pdf

@KlementineJBS
Copy link
Owner Author

KlementineJBS commented Oct 19, 2022

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
linear amine repeat Repeat attempt of a reaction
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant