Properly support extended, experimental field Spec.CommonRouteSpec.ParentRefs[*].Port
in TCPRoute & UDPRoute
#4958
Labels
area/gateway-api
Relating to upstream Kubernetes SIG Networking Gateway API
kind/conformance
Conformance to upstream Kubernetes SIG Networking Gateway API
onboarding
priority/low
Is there an existing issue for this?
Problem Statement
Currently only field
Spec.CommonRouteSpec.ParentRefs[*].SectionName
is properly supported, seethat fixes
destination
port taken from backendRef and not from listener config #4864Setting
Spec.CommonRouteSpec.ParentRefs[*].Port
does not have any effect. It should work as described in the specification.Proposed Solution
Implement support for
Port
field as described in the gateway-api spec.Additional information
Conformance tests in
gateway-api
repo for checking this doesn't exist when it was been written. Ensure that is properly tested, consider adding such test to the upstream.Acceptance Criteria
Spec.CommonRouteSpec.ParentRefs[*].Port
works as described in spec for TCPRoute & UDPRouteThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: