Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Google Drive or S3 as a source? #126

Open
ferni7 opened this issue Jul 28, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Google Drive or S3 as a source? #126

ferni7 opened this issue Jul 28, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@ferni7
Copy link

ferni7 commented Jul 28, 2016

Hi there,

Do you have any plans to support Google Drive or S3 buckets as a source? Or any workarounds to have these as a source?

Thanks!

@Kris-B
Copy link
Owner

Kris-B commented Jul 31, 2016

Hi,
I'm looking to support new online storage services. But I didn't made any choice at this time.
Online storage for photos can only be considered if there's an API with anonymous access and with automatic thumbnail generation.

Do you have any expierence with S3 or Google Drive?

@ferni7
Copy link
Author

ferni7 commented Jul 31, 2016

Thanks Kris,

Google Drive and S3 both support anonymous access but don't think we will get thumbnail generation, so may not be a good fit, unless it can generate and cache locally with the webhost...

Would it be feasable to setup nanoPhotosProvider script to use GoogleDrive or S3 bucket as a source to serve to nanoGALLERY?

@Kris-B
Copy link
Owner

Kris-B commented Aug 2, 2016

nanoPhotosProvider is not designed for this kind of purpose

I would like to implement online storage with automatic thumbnail generation to avoid complex settings and configuartion.
Dropbox provides a nice API but the free storage is very limited in space...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants