Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce triaxiality into cluster satellite distributions #89

Open
aphearin opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Introduce triaxiality into cluster satellite distributions #89

aphearin opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@aphearin
Copy link
Collaborator

I have recently finished implementing an overhaul to the spatial distributions of satellite galaxies in cosmoDC2, with the primary goal of supporting efforts within the cluster working group to study biases that can result from cluster projection effects. In the new modeling approach, satellites will be distributed according to an ellipsoidal NFW profile, as opposed to the current approach that directly uses subhalo-based positions taken from UniverseMachine. In order to implement this new approach, it was necessary to develop an analytical model for the shapes of host halos, since halo shape information is not available in the version of the Outer Rim halo catalogs used in cosmoDC2. The plots below demonstrate the fidelity with which the model recovers halo shapes in the Bolshoi-Planck simulation. The code implementing this model is located here.

Comments welcome from anyone with science targets that are influenced by satellite distributions. After further input, particularly and hopefully from the cluster WG, the ellipsoidal NFW model is the model we will use to generate the 5000 deg**2 catalog.

CC @erykoff @j-dr @evevkovacs @katrinheitmann @hywu @abmantz @yymao

compare_b_to_a

compare_c_to_a

compare_prolaticity

compare_ellipticity

compare_c_to_a_vs_b_to_a

compare_prolaticity_vs_ellipticity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant