Licence

[exussum12]

The licencing on this is confusing

The suggests YUMMY
The suggests MIT

suggests Propriety - Could these be all aligned to the preferred licence ?

[welcome]

Hello there! Thanks for opening your first issue on this repo!

Just a heads-up: Here at Backpack we use Github Issues only for tracking bugs. Talk about new features is also acceptable. This helps a lot in keeping our focus on improving Backpack. If you issue is not a bug/feature, please help us out by closing the issue yourself and posting in the appropriate medium (see below). If you're not sure where it fits, it's ok, a community member will probably reply to help you with that.

Backpack communication mediums:

• Bug Reports, Feature Requests - Github Issues (here);
• Quick help (How do I do X) - Gitter Chatroom;
• Long questions (I have done X and Y and it won't do Z wtf) - Stackoverflow, using the backpack-for-laravel tag;

Please keep in mind Backpack offers no official / paid support. Whatever help you receive here, on Gitter, Slack or Stackoverflow is thanks to our awesome awesome community members, who give up some of their time to help their peers. If you want to join our community, just start pitching in. We take pride in being a welcoming bunch.

Thank you!

--
Justin Case
The Backpack Robot

[tabacitu]

Right! Thank you @exussum12 - I've just removed the MIT license mentioned in the README. It hasn't been under MIT in a long time.

Cheers!

[tabacitu]

@promatik could you please do the same as fe3594c for our other packages?