Fix negative affixes

[sixfold-origami]

We want to keep these because they are very cool and thematic, and let you take meaningful drawbacks on your build.

Problems:

• Fast swapping
• Martial/caster division for free points
• Compile-time hard countering

Proposal 1: Restrict by class/species only

• Add class and species restrictions to affixes
• Open question: frontline/backline divide is very fuzzy for many classes. how to handle?
  • Can add stronger restrictions (an affix is only listed for your class if there's no way you can abuse it), but that's lame

Proposal 2: Class talents

• Remove combat talents
• Add class talents: they're like combat talents, but for your class
• Add negative class talents, aka "class drawbacks". Players can opt into these and they cancel out class talents 1:1 (letting you pick more talents)
• Remove any negative affix that isn't a detriment to every build (might be all negative affixes)

Regardless we want:

• Class and species restrictions on affixes as a nice to have. They open up a lot of interesting design space.

[sixfold-origami]

Proposal 2 has some problems:

• Restricts talent space (and by extension, drawback space) considerably. It's much harder to have talents that hook into global systems (ex: you cannot block) when using only class talents
• Explodes content requirements: talents are now n^2, like powers

[sixfold-origami]

Proposal 3: Role declaration

• When making your character, declare your role/approach/position
• Add role declarations to rolling respec
• Add role restrictions to affixes (could potentially replace class restrictions)
• Open questions:
  • Not sure whether you declare something for each category, or just some of the categories, or if we use some other system

[sixfold-origami]

Proposal 4: No gain, no pain

• Remove negative affixes entirely
• F's in chat

[sixfold-origami]

Conjecture: negative affixes should only be able to include drawbacks that affect the gear itself. Ex: "This weapon costs 1 essence to use"