Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

No length regularization in LevelsetLoss? #15

Closed
Yangr116 opened this issue Feb 5, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

No length regularization in LevelsetLoss? #15

Yangr116 opened this issue Feb 5, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Yangr116
Copy link

Yangr116 commented Feb 5, 2023

Hi, why is there not the third term (length regularization) in LevelsetLoss as described in Eq.3 of the paper? How many gains/drops will it bring?
@LiWentomng
Copy link
Owner

@Yangr116
Hi, in the ablation study, the length regularization of Level set loss is adopted, which is beneficial for the performance (especially when the performance is low). In the main results, I found that the length regularization can bring the 0.2~0.4mAP drop. So, I commented the calculation for the better final results.

@Yangr116
Copy link
Author

Yangr116 commented Feb 5, 2023

Thanks for your reply!

@Yangr116 Yangr116 closed this as completed Feb 5, 2023
@LiWentomng LiWentomng mentioned this issue Aug 7, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@LiWentomng @Yangr116