Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor transactionDetailView - Closes #784 #849

Merged
merged 10 commits into from Jun 1, 2018

Conversation

michaeltomasik
Copy link
Contributor

What was the problem?

transactionDetailView.js had repetitive code

How did I fix it?

Created components containers to wrap fields

How to test it?

Review transactionDetailView

Review checklist

@michaeltomasik michaeltomasik self-assigned this May 29, 2018
@michaeltomasik michaeltomasik added this to New Issues in Sprint Board 21-05-18 via automation May 29, 2018
@michaeltomasik michaeltomasik added this to New Issues in Version 0.9.0 via automation May 29, 2018
@michaeltomasik michaeltomasik requested review from reyraa and slaweet and removed request for reyraa May 29, 2018 06:53
@slaweet slaweet moved this from New Issues to Pull Requests in Sprint Board 21-05-18 May 30, 2018
@slaweet slaweet removed this from Pull Requests in Sprint Board 21-05-18 May 30, 2018
@slaweet slaweet moved this from New Issues to Pull Requests in Version 0.9.0 May 30, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@slaweet slaweet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job, Mike 👍

@michaeltomasik michaeltomasik merged commit 87a453e into 0.9.0 Jun 1, 2018
Version 0.9.0 automation moved this from Pull Requests to Merged Pull Requests Jun 1, 2018
@michaeltomasik michaeltomasik deleted the 784-refactor-transactiondetailview branch June 1, 2018 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Version 0.9.0
  
Merged Pull Requests
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants