You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
uiop define-package is more flexible with additional clauses and more convenient during development (e.g. when symbols change).
I want to add some examples in the packages page for uiop:define-package.
Currently there are only examples with cl:defpackage.
My question is: Should we add a few examples with uiop:define-package but keep it mostly with cl:defpackage or should we convert most package definitions to uiop:define-package and only showcase few examples of cl:defpackage?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
uiop define-package
is more flexible with additional clauses and more convenient during development (e.g. when symbols change).I want to add some examples in the packages page for
uiop:define-package
.Currently there are only examples with
cl:defpackage
.My question is: Should we add a few examples with
uiop:define-package
but keep it mostly withcl:defpackage
or should we convert most package definitions touiop:define-package
and only showcase few examples ofcl:defpackage
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: