You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I search for luajit performance optimisation, I get a smallerlisttolook at. However, I dont find the luajit wiki.
1.Could you link the wiki in the README or a separate markdown/docs? It is hidden in the lua wiki under luajit and I searched for quite a while to find it.
2. Is the luajit wiki fairly complete and up to date regarding that? I dont find a tracking issue or label "wiki". It would also make the wiki look more reputable, when it asks for user authentication.
EDIT: clear out unrelevant parts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On 8 Feb 2021, 14:21 +0300, matu3ba ***@***.***>, wrote:
When I search for luajit performance optimisation, I get a smaller list to look at.
However, I dont find the luajit wiki.
1.Could you link the wiki in the README or a separate markdown/docs? It is hidden in the lua wiki under luajit and I searched for quite a while to find it.
2. Is the luajit wiki fairly complete and up to date regarding that? I dont find a tracking issue or label "wiki".
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
matu3ba
changed the title
question: luajit wiki: status and how to find it
question: luajit wiki: status ~~and how to find it~~
Feb 8, 2021
matu3ba
changed the title
question: luajit wiki: status ~~and how to find it~~
question: luajit wiki: status
Feb 8, 2021
When I search for luajit performance optimisation, I get a smaller list to look at.
However, I dont find the luajit wiki.1.Could you link the wiki in the README or a separate markdown/docs? It is hidden in the lua wiki under luajit and I searched for quite a while to find it.2. Is the luajit wiki fairly complete and up to date regarding that?
I dont find a tracking issue or label "wiki". It would also make the wiki look more reputable, when it asks for user authentication.EDIT: clear out unrelevant parts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: