Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducing Camera-Ready Improved Numbers #72

Closed
dfan opened this issue Nov 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Reproducing Camera-Ready Improved Numbers #72

dfan opened this issue Nov 30, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@dfan
Copy link

dfan commented Nov 30, 2022

The NeurIPS camera ready version (v3 on arXiv) has some significantly higher results than the previous paper version (v2 on arXiv). E.g. for ViT-B pretrained on K400 for 1600 epochs, performance on K400 jumps from 80.9% to 81.5%. For ViT-B pretrained on SSv2 for 2400 epochs, performance on SSv2 jumps from 70.6% to 70.8%. Could the authors share the updated finetuning code and configs? I am unable to reproduce the new results. My results are close to what is reported in v2 of the paper

@yztongzhan
Copy link
Collaborator

We have fixed one issue in this commit and the performance on Kinetics-400 can be improved by about 0.5%.

@yztongzhan
Copy link
Collaborator

The results on Kinetics-400 can be reproduced successfully by MMAction2.

@dfan
Copy link
Author

dfan commented Dec 2, 2022

Hm with the latest code I am getting 70.3% on SSv2 and 81.3% on K400 with the 2400 and 1600 epoch off-shelf pretrained weights provided in this repo. I am using this script and this script except I changed the batch size to meet my memory constraints. I am using 64 GPUs

--batch_size 2
--update_freq 3
--num_sample 2

@yztongzhan
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @dfan! I think --batch_size 2 is too small to get favorable results. --update_freq 3 might be a trick to enlarge the batch-size, but I am not sure the performance can be reproduced.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants