Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing generic attributes cpe - misp-objects #1187

Closed
adulau opened this issue May 27, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Missing generic attributes cpe - misp-objects #1187

adulau opened this issue May 27, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
P: high Priority: high. This issue should be resolved as quickly as possible T: datamodel enhancement Type: datamodel enhancement. This issue calls for an improvement to the datamodel T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue requires improving an existing feature

Comments

@adulau
Copy link
Member

adulau commented May 27, 2016

Following the new object type vulnerability to be implemented in MISP 3.0, we need a generic attributes cpe.

CPE format 2.2 or 2.3 is required.

We would need a simple validation parser for the CPE string. The whole doc is available at the following location: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistir/ir7695/NISTIR-7695-CPE-Naming.pdf
@adulau adulau added T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue requires improving an existing feature P: high Priority: high. This issue should be resolved as quickly as possible T: datamodel enhancement Type: datamodel enhancement. This issue calls for an improvement to the datamodel labels May 27, 2016
@Rafiot Rafiot added this to the release3.0 milestone Jun 1, 2016
@adulau
Copy link
Member Author

adulau commented Dec 20, 2016

Fixed in v2.4.57 https://github.com/MISP/MISP/tree/v2.4.57

@adulau adulau closed this as completed Dec 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
P: high Priority: high. This issue should be resolved as quickly as possible T: datamodel enhancement Type: datamodel enhancement. This issue calls for an improvement to the datamodel T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue requires improving an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@adulau @Rafiot