/
machinetag.json
48 lines (48 loc) · 1.7 KB
/
machinetag.json
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
{
"namespace": "event-assessment",
"expanded": "Event Assessment",
"refs": [
"http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/Tversky_Kahneman_1974.pdf",
"http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/PsychofIntelNew.pdf"
],
"description": "A series of assessment predicates describing the event assessment performed to make judgement(s) under a certain level of uncertainty.",
"version": 2,
"predicates": [
{
"value": "alternative-points-of-view-process",
"expanded": "Alternative points of view process",
"description": "A list of procedures or practices which describe alternative points of view to validate or rate an analysis. The list describes techniques or methods which could reinforce the estimative language in a human analysis and/or challenge the assumptions to reduce the potential bias of the analysis introduced by the analyst(s)."
}
],
"values": [
{
"predicate": "alternative-points-of-view-process",
"entry": [
{
"value": "analytic-debates-within-the-organisation",
"expanded": "analytic debates within the organisation"
},
{
"value": "devils-advocates-methodology",
"expanded": "Devil's advocates methodology"
},
{
"value": "competitive-analysis",
"expanded": "competitive analysis"
},
{
"value": "interdisciplinary-brainstorming",
"expanded": "interdisciplinary brainstorming"
},
{
"value": "intra-office-peer-review",
"expanded": "intra-office peer review"
},
{
"value": "outside-expertise-review",
"expanded": "Outside expertise review"
}
]
}
]
}