Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pro chest requirements #205

Closed
AKryukov92 opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Pro chest requirements #205

AKryukov92 opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@AKryukov92
Copy link
Contributor

Currently player needs to get high kill/death ratio and some amount of score to get access to pro chest.
I propose:

  • Allow all players to put good items
  • Allow to get items only to players, who put some amount of good items
  • Allow to put any item to players, who put some amount of good items

List of good items:

  • Steel/Mese/Diamond sword
  • Ammo
  • Shotgun
  • Rifle
  • Mese/Diamond pick
  • Apple
  • SMG
  • Wood planks

I propose this because "pro" players usually don't follow strategy: Attack with average weapons, steal good weapons and put good to chest. And this is annoying. I am trying to weaken enemy while those "pros" just wasting good swords in reckless attack.

@tidle
Copy link
Contributor

tidle commented Oct 15, 2018

good idea, i'll try to implement it

@AKryukov92
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd like some feedback from @ClobberXD , @Thomas--S and @rubenwardy about this feature.
@tidle is going to do some work on it. It will be frustrating if he will do all work, but feature will be denied or significally changed after discussion. Even if he will not do it, I'm going to

@Thomas--S
Copy link
Member

Actually, I prefer the current solution.

@ClobberXD
Copy link
Contributor

@AKryukov92 I'm not sure if this is a good idea, or at least one that offers significant improvement w/ respect to the current implementation. It's not as easy as allowing everyone who put good stuff to take good stuff from the chest. We'll have to wait and see if this actually works better. I'm neutral.

@AKryukov92
Copy link
Contributor Author

If you think that it is easier to make "allow everyone who put good stuff to take good stuff", then I am agree with it. It sounds simpler and encourages correct behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants