You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 3, 2024. It is now read-only.
I keep getting this error when trying to run filter_away_subset.py:
The number of PBID records in the files disagree! Sanity check failed.
num of PBIDs in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.rep.fq: 42573
num of PBIDs in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.gff: 42573
num of PBIDs in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.abundance.txt: 41858
I'm not having problems with any of the other scripts. I updated to the latest cDNA_Cupcake version and I am using minimap2 to map reads to the genome. This seems to be similar to #15, but I have not found that I have the same issue with IDs not matching up between the cluster report and group txt. Do you have an idea of what could be going wrong?
Thank you!
Gabby
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well the error is exactly what the error is saying....in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.abundance.txt somehow you have fewer number of PBIDs than the GFF and FASTQ files.
Can you show the first 20 lines of polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.abundance.txt with head -n 20 polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.abundance.txt as a first step sanity check?
--Liz
Hi Liz,
I keep getting this error when trying to run filter_away_subset.py:
The number of PBID records in the files disagree! Sanity check failed.
num of PBIDs in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.rep.fq: 42573
num of PBIDs in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.gff: 42573
num of PBIDs in polished.hq.fastq.sorted.sam.merge.collapsed.abundance.txt: 41858
I'm not having problems with any of the other scripts. I updated to the latest cDNA_Cupcake version and I am using minimap2 to map reads to the genome. This seems to be similar to #15, but I have not found that I have the same issue with IDs not matching up between the cluster report and group txt. Do you have an idea of what could be going wrong?
Thank you!
Gabby
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: