New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Visiting /vm_or_template/explorer/:id yields an error #6696
Comments
But, the second is not the "Record not found" screen, or anything nice, so this still needs fixing :). Also, in the case of this explorer:
So, we should probably just accept a raw id as well. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months. If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the traige process documentation. |
cc @skateman Not sure if your dead routes detection was aware of this one or not. (it's not actually dead, so probably not...more just wanted it on your radar) |
Yeah, working on it #7131 EDIT: this is not actually related to the dead routes, this can happen on any route. Basically anything you send after the |
@Fryguy @kavyanekkalapu is this still an issue or resolved in #7131 ? |
I am not able to understand the issue. Can we access specific record details of explorer table record using id? Only route working for me is -> http://localhost:3000/vm_or_template/explorer#/ |
This is still an issue in the sense that the route table lets you hit a URL like http://localhost:3000/vm_or_template/explorer/1, but you get an error page with a stack trace issue that blows up as opposed to something like the 404 page, which is more expected. Similarly you can hit http://localhost:3000/vm_or_template/explorer/abc and instead of 404 it blows up. http://localhost:3000/vm_or_template/explorer/v-1 is an example of a URL that works correctly, because we expect a tree-id. There are multiple ways to fix, the easiest being to just catch unexpected id values and redirect to 404. Alternatively, we could support id-based URLs as well which would allow for deep linking. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months. If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation. |
While this is an uncommon route it is exposed via routes.rb and should seemingly redirect, but it gives this error...
cc @himdel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: