Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about comparative experiment #24

Open
hrtan opened this issue Oct 17, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Question about comparative experiment #24

hrtan opened this issue Oct 17, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@hrtan
Copy link

hrtan commented Oct 17, 2019

Hello

ConvCRF is an amazing work.

I have a question about the experiment on ConvCRF and CRFasRNN. In general, DenseCRF can increase MIoU by 3%, Which means that even without end-to-end jointly fine tuning, the CNN-DenseCRF system can achieve a better MIoU than the unary (CNN). But I notice that in this paper, MIoU of FCN-ResNet101-CRFasRNN is about 69, lower than the raw MIoU of its unary module FCN-ResNet101 (about 71).

What happends to DenseCRF that makes its accuracy declining so hard?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant