Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Validator only validates what we have working, not what is required by the spec #182

Closed
ml-evs opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Validator only validates what we have working, not what is required by the spec #182

ml-evs opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
priority/high Issue or PR with a consensus of high priority validator Related to the OPTIMADE validator
Projects
Road to optimade-python-tools 1.0

Comments

@ml-evs
Copy link
Member

ml-evs commented Feb 15, 2020

Just an issue to keep reminding me to add non-optional queries that we don't support (yet) to the validator.
@CasperWA CasperWA added validator Related to the OPTIMADE validator priority/high Issue or PR with a consensus of high priority labels Feb 17, 2020
@CasperWA
Copy link
Member

CasperWA commented Mar 2, 2020 •
edited

This is (some what) related to #198

@CasperWA CasperWA moved this from To do to In progress in Road to optimade-python-tools 1.0 Mar 5, 2020
@ml-evs
Copy link
Member Author

ml-evs commented Mar 10, 2020

We can also close this as a result of #213.

@ml-evs ml-evs closed this as completed Mar 10, 2020
Road to optimade-python-tools 1.0 automation moved this from In progress to Done Mar 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority/high Issue or PR with a consensus of high priority validator Related to the OPTIMADE validator
Projects
Road to optimade-python-tools 1.0
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ml-evs @CasperWA