Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

should we rename the repository from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ? #135

Open
petersilva opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

should we rename the repository from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ? #135

petersilva opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Policy some kind of philosophical approach.

Comments

@petersilva
Copy link
Contributor

The repository with the C implementation is currently called sarrac. That was the name used for the v2 C package.
The debian amd RPM packages built from it for version 3 are called metpx-sr3c. As part of the build process for RPMS, one must have the directory containing the package match the package name, so need to override the destination on every clone when making RPM packages.

I am wondering if it would be cleaner to rename the package to be metpx-sr3c

Having the name of the C package sarrac be a substring of sarracenia, causes mild confusion.

@petersilva petersilva added the Policy some kind of philosophical approach. label Dec 11, 2023
@petersilva petersilva changed the title should we rename the repostitory from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ? should we rename the repository from sarrac to metpx-sr3c ? Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Policy some kind of philosophical approach.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant