Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deep-links interface should be equivalent to RPC interface #1872

Open
danfinlay opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Deep-links interface should be equivalent to RPC interface #1872

danfinlay opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@danfinlay
Copy link
Contributor

Maintaining our deep link interface is currently a per-method interface.

To simplify maintenance and increase its stability and security, we could build a query-param schema that is equivalent to our JSON-RPC interface, and pass those messages directly to our normal dapp provider infrastructure.

This would allow us to avoid any bugs that could arise from introducing new types of interfaces, like #1871

@Wyctus
Copy link

Wyctus commented Jul 27, 2021

What is the state of this feature? Is there any way at the moment to call arbitrary function through Metamask Mobile?

@matteosistisette
Copy link

Is there a generic URL format to initiate an arbitrary transaction to an arbitrary contact with arbitrary data?? (as opposed to known methods of contracts that implement known interfaces)

@Fbartoli
Copy link

Any news on the release of that feature ?

@hcaumo
Copy link

hcaumo commented Dec 19, 2022

I tried to call approve on polygon but not working.

Does someone knows a solution?

@vitalif
Copy link

vitalif commented Mar 15, 2023

+1, tried to generate EIP-681 links for approve and even for transfer, seems that it doesn't work

@aerynquarmby
Copy link

any update on doing approvals with QR Code? e.g. https://metamask.app.link/send/pay-contractAddress/approve?address=receiverAddress&uint256=1e2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants