Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recording Independent Audio Tracks #22

Open
MaxHillebrand opened this issue Aug 27, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Recording Independent Audio Tracks #22

MaxHillebrand opened this issue Aug 27, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@MaxHillebrand
Copy link
Contributor

It would be AWESOME if the recorder can create a different audio track for each user. This would be very useful for ending up with a higher quality and easier audio-editing, as nobody talks over each other, at least in the recording.

@MaxHillebrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

FWIW, this could be "hacked" for 2 person conversation, by having a setting to mute a participant in the recording, and then that party recording locally.
It just would be awesome to have it done inside the app, and so that it works even with many participants.

@mwalbeck mwalbeck added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 27, 2021
@mwalbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this one is going to be a bit more difficult, at least I don't think it's possible using the current recording method, but it might very well be possible using the MediaStream Recording API. I had a look at it for implementing the initial recording, but because each stream is presented individually it would have been quite a lot of work to both record and then assemble the video afterwards. But it would be useful for this feature, and since you don't have the visual element that needs to be assembled any post-processing will be quite a lot easier.

@MaxHillebrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds great.

FWIW, I think the multiple audio track feature will only be used in the case that some post-production editing is done. So I guess we can assume at least some level of human interaction with those files before they are published, and maybe we don't need some post-processing features.

@mwalbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

Oh yeah, with post-processing I meant in the more simple stuff like placing the individual audio recordings into one container.

But doing it locally might be better for your use case where the above doesn't really apply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants