New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FeatureRequest: Ramlog #2 vs Full Logrotate #2662
Labels
Comments
@Gill-Bates Note that the amount of logs between
|
Gotcha! Thanks for sharing your ideas with us |
It should probably be noted in the documentation that filling the disk is a possibility for ramlog#2, I didn't see it there and just hit this issue causing some pretty gnarly issues. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I understand I can choose three different Ramlogs:
Why don't I have a logrotate at No. 2? This variant is apparently ideal to increase the lifetime of SSD/SD cards. I understand that No. 2 has the same amount of logs as full logging. So logrotate would make sense, wouldn't it?
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: