Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Windows 64-bit Storage Explorer #106

Closed
craxal opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Windows 64-bit Storage Explorer #106

craxal opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@MRayermannMSFT
Labels
💡 feature request New feature or request ✅ merged A fix for this issue has been merged
Milestone
1.30.0

Comments

@craxal
Copy link
Contributor

craxal commented Apr 30, 2018 •
edited

Since macOS and Linux platforms only use 64-bit versions of Storage Explorer, we're planning to make a 64-bit version available for Windows users in the very near future. In tandem, we intend to phase out and drop support for 32-bit versions.

Please let us know any concerns you may have.
@craxal craxal changed the title 64-bit Storage Explorer Windows 64-bit Storage Explorer Apr 30, 2018
@craxal craxal added this to the 1.2.0 milestone May 3, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT self-assigned this May 10, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT removed this from the 1.2.0 milestone May 23, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added this to the future milestone Aug 9, 2018
@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2021
Closed
3 tasks
@prayaas-a prayaas-a mentioned this issue Sep 2, 2022
Closed
3 tasks
@HenryGelderbloem
Copy link

Any update on the progress of this? This has been on the backlog for almost 5 years.

@craxal craxal modified the milestones: Future, 1.30.0 Feb 27, 2023
@craxal
Copy link
Contributor Author

craxal commented Feb 27, 2023

@HenryGelderbloem We actually just had a discussion about this. Since very few of users are these days on 32-bit machines, we're planning on making this available in the near future.

@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added the 💡 feature request New feature or request label Apr 26, 2023
@MRayermannMSFT
Copy link
Member

We should be all good to go to ship 64 bit for 1.30.0.

@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT added the ✅ merged A fix for this issue has been merged label May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MRayermannMSFT MRayermannMSFT

Labels
💡 feature request New feature or request ✅ merged A fix for this issue has been merged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.30.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@craxal @MRayermannMSFT @HenryGelderbloem