New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NuGet package for strongly typed DacFx #393
Comments
Thanks Mihail for your interest in the project. I agree this is a good idea and we are working on getting this done. I don't have a firm date yet as we are still working on getting a signed version to include in the NuGet package. Stay tuned. Lonny |
Thank you, Lonny! |
Any update on this? |
Hi Erik and Mihail. We do not have a firm ETA for resolving this issue at present. Nugetization support is on our backlog but we've been prioritizing some other work ahead of this. We will keep this thread updated if and when this changes. Thanks, |
Hi, any progress on this? |
Is it any help if we get it signed and package it up? Are there any technical problems to doing it? The main blocker I see (unless i'm missing something) is that the DacFx (and script dom) is redistributable only in msi form - is this right? Can it be changed? If we had a nuget of this and the dependencies then it would make our life so much easier and I can spend some time on it. ed |
We hope to produce a nuget package once the dependencies (SQLDOM in particular) are not installed into the GAC by default. We're actively working on this but exact timing is TBD. |
Cool thanks for clarifying! /slopes away to add a license.txt to a few packages :) |
The nuget version of DacFx is out now - would it be possible to get an appveyor build setup which would publish to nuget.org or something? |
Getting this built on Appveyor and pushed to Nuget now would be awesome! |
Almost 3 years in, any chance this will happen soon? |
I ended up just pulling on the project in my solution, but please, could you just state: this is not going to happen, or provide an ETA? |
This Its easier to select metadata from the information schema or sys tables and hold that data in custom written classes than it is to use the It's an enormous disservice to much of the work you all have done for SSDT and SQL server by continuing to push that very-hard-to-use model. Please either include this into DacFx or a separate package (that is consumable by sql projects and can replace the SQL tt stuff). |
Any update on this? |
moved from dacextensions repo, related to https://github.com/microsoft/DACExtensions/tree/master/DacFxStronglyTypedModel |
Please, create NuGet package for Strongly Typed Model!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: