Replace for and while loops with foeach loops

[JamieMagee]

This increases the overall readability of the code, and has been supported since Java 5.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #421 into dev will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 47.05%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                dev    #421      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage     45.92%     46%   +0.08%     
- Complexity     2198    2203       +5     
===========================================
  Files           108     108              
  Lines         25210   25193      -17     
  Branches       4164    4164              
===========================================
+ Hits          11577   11591      +14     
+ Misses        11711   11677      -34     
- Partials       1922    1925       +3

Flag	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
#JDBC41	45.72% <47.05%> (+0.04%)	2186 <1> (+1)	⬆️
#JDBC42	45.83% <47.05%> (+0.02%)	2195 <1> (+3)	⬆️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...l/googlecode/concurrentlinkedhashmap/Weighers.java	8.51% <0%> (ø)	1 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...ava/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/KerbCallback.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...c/main/java/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/Util.java	60.04% <0%> (ø)	91 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...va/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/StreamColInfo.java	78.26% <100%> (-0.91%)	6 <0> (ø)
...m/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerException.java	76.85% <100%> (-0.38%)	29 <0> (ø)
...va/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/StreamTabName.java	85% <100%> (-0.72%)	7 <0> (ø)
...oft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerBulkCSVFileRecord.java	41.63% <14.28%> (-0.5%)	28 <0> (ø)
...m/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerResultSet.java	33.14% <20%> (-0.01%)	252 <1> (+1)
...rc/main/java/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/TVP.java	45.18% <25%> (-0.08%)	27 <0> (ø)
...oft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerPreparedStatement.java	49.91% <50%> (+0.25%)	163 <0> (ø)	⬇️
... and 14 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7741ee9...7b7275b. Read the comment docs.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #421 into dev will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 47.05%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                dev    #421      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage     45.92%     46%   +0.08%     
- Complexity     2198    2203       +5     
===========================================
  Files           108     108              
  Lines         25210   25193      -17     
  Branches       4164    4164              
===========================================
+ Hits          11577   11591      +14     
+ Misses        11711   11677      -34     
- Partials       1922    1925       +3

Flag	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
#JDBC41	45.72% <47.05%> (+0.04%)	2186 <1> (+1)	⬆️
#JDBC42	45.83% <47.05%> (+0.02%)	2195 <1> (+3)	⬆️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...ava/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/KerbCallback.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...c/main/java/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/Util.java	60.04% <0%> (ø)	91 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...l/googlecode/concurrentlinkedhashmap/Weighers.java	8.51% <0%> (ø)	1 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...m/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerException.java	76.85% <100%> (-0.38%)	29 <0> (ø)
...va/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/StreamTabName.java	85% <100%> (-0.72%)	7 <0> (ø)
...va/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/StreamColInfo.java	78.26% <100%> (-0.91%)	6 <0> (ø)
...oft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerBulkCSVFileRecord.java	41.63% <14.28%> (-0.5%)	28 <0> (ø)
...m/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerResultSet.java	33.14% <20%> (-0.01%)	252 <1> (+1)
...rc/main/java/com/microsoft/sqlserver/jdbc/TVP.java	45.18% <25%> (-0.08%)	27 <0> (ø)
...oft/sqlserver/jdbc/SQLServerPreparedStatement.java	49.91% <50%> (+0.25%)	163 <0> (ø)	⬇️
... and 14 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7741ee9...7b7275b. Read the comment docs.

[cheenamalhotra]

ForEach loops are ideally more efficient way of performing iterations. I don't see any issues with these changes. We shall merge this PR soon.

[JamieMagee]

@cheenamalhotra Thanks for the review. Is it possible to merge this now?

[ajlam]

Hi @JamieMagee, we'll merge your two PRs with the next preview release (v6.3.2).

[peterbae]

Testing was good, merging in.