Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The template deployment error show that "pergb2018" is not a valid option for price tier now. #25161

Closed
ericcwk opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 — with docs.microsoft.com · 3 comments

Comments

Copy link

ericcwk commented Feb 18, 2019

New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment : 12:34:33 PM - Resource Microsoft.OperationalInsights/workspaces 'AIAPOC' failed with message '{
"error": {
"code": "BadRequest",
"message": "Pricing tier doesn't match the subscription's billing model. Read http://aka.ms/PricingTierWarning for more details."
}

Noted that i have just executed the same template last week. This option is still valid on last week


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@KrishnaG-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

@ericcwk Thanks for the Comment. We are actively investigating and will get back to you soon.

@KrishnaG-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for letting us know on this @ericcwk.
Looks like it is related to #6901 issue. Check if this can help you to resolve the issue.
In other words, the error "Pricing tier doesn't match the subscription's billing model. Read http://aka.ms/PricingTierWarning for more details" is seen if you try to create a log analytics workspace by opting pricing tier as "Per GB" (in Azure portal) or "PerGB2018" (in ARM template) by having your subscription currently in an older pricing model (with access to multiple pricing tiers). To resolve the error, change the monitoring pricing model from the subscription on the Pricing model selection page under Monitor > Usage and estimated costs.
Please find below screenshots for reference.

cap1

cap2

cap3

cap4

cap5

@KrishnaG-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

@ericcwk At this point it appears that there's no edits or updates needed for the documentation. Closing this issue for now. If there are further questions regarding this matter or questions or feedback on the documentation, please do let us know and we will gladly continue the discussion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants