Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

why are we supporting implicit flow #55177

Closed
som-nitjsr opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

why are we supporting implicit flow #55177

som-nitjsr opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@jasonnutter
Labels
active-directory/svc assigned-to-author develop/subsvc Pri2 product-question triaged

Comments

@som-nitjsr
Copy link
Contributor

som-nitjsr commented May 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

[Enter feedback here]
I think we should support only BBF(bank end for front end) and should not encourage implicit flow as in oauth 2.1 there is going to be only two flow.

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
@jasonnutter
Copy link
Contributor

@som-nitjsr We are currently working on MSAL.js 2.0, which will switch to the Auth Code Flow w/ PKCE. You can find more information at AzureAD/microsoft-authentication-library-for-js#1000

@jasonnutter
Copy link
Contributor

#sign-off

@jasonnutter
Copy link
Contributor

#please-close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jasonnutter jasonnutter

Labels
active-directory/svc assigned-to-author develop/subsvc Pri2 product-question triaged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@jasonnutter @som-nitjsr @PRMerger7 @PRMerger8 @SaurabhSharma-MSFT