You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my corporate environment, we only enable service and GA features.
Since batch account private link is GA, so I would like to use the feature.
But create the pool in private vnet without public ip is in preview
Does this combination make any sense, batch account FQDN is my private endpoint, but the pool is created with public IP?
Why I need a private endpoint batch account to communicate to pool node via public ip?
[Enter feedback here]
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
ID: ccb356b2-fb60-e833-94c0-68e7b020949e
Version Independent ID: 06b27a8c-86c4-3f99-0393-0cc74f3e3053
@RonnieQuan Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to content author to check and update the document as appropriate. We will update you accordingly.
Hi @RonnieQuan, these are separate features and that scenario is supported if it meets your needs. Of course, using private endpoints with pools that don't use public IP addresses is also a supported scenario although you are correct, pools without public IP addresses are still in public preview at this time.
I will close this issue now but let us know if there are further issues related to this document!
#please-close
In my corporate environment, we only enable service and GA features.
Since batch account private link is GA, so I would like to use the feature.
But create the pool in private vnet without public ip is in preview
Does this combination make any sense, batch account FQDN is my private endpoint, but the pool is created with public IP?
Why I need a private endpoint batch account to communicate to pool node via public ip?
[Enter feedback here]
Document Details
⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: