You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it will be worth to generalize the expression framework over two other types:
Fiat Shamir Challenges
Constants
We wil need it later, I think.
We can then use the same expression framework to define the folding expressions.
An expression has four type parameters, at least: 'f, 'challenges, 'constants, 'columns
'f -> the field the values will be defined over 'challenges -> Fiat Shamir challenges -> make it generic to go from any polynomial IP to non interactive polynomial proofs. 'constants -> to make generic over the curves, the permutation we might use, etc 'columns -> the polynomial variables
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it will be worth to generalize the expression framework over two other types:
We wil need it later, I think.
We can then use the same expression framework to define the folding expressions.
An expression has four type parameters, at least:
'f, 'challenges, 'constants, 'columns
'f
-> the field the values will be defined over'challenges
-> Fiat Shamir challenges -> make it generic to go from any polynomial IP to non interactive polynomial proofs.'constants
-> to make generic over the curves, the permutation we might use, etc'columns
-> the polynomial variablesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: