Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differences between MBAR and BAR #123

Closed
AnguseZhang opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Differences between MBAR and BAR #123

AnguseZhang opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@AnguseZhang
Copy link

When performing FEP, I found there are significant differences between MBAR and BAR, as the figure shows.

image

image

I used example from FESetup: T4 with benzol and oxylene. The large gap often appears in solvated simulations. (I would also want to know the reference value of complex and solvated ddG
for this system)

When only putting data of two adjacent states into MBAR, MBAR results are the same with BAR.
But putting data of all states, the gap appears.

image

This is my code

python alchemical_analysis.py -d . -q xvg -p dhdl -u kJ

This is original file.

data.zip

I also tried alchemlyb and using original pymbar, but the results are the same.

In my view, MBAR and BAR are both unbiased estimators, and thus the estimation (free energy difference ) should be the same. Could you please give me some instructions ? Thanks !

@davidlmobley
Copy link
Member

BAR and MBAR ARE slightly different, so will yield slightly different results. Sounds like your question is best directed at the pymbar issue tracker though.

Marking as closed since it's not an issue with this package.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants