Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KS3 and over-clustering? #409

Closed
DemetrisS opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #595
Closed

KS3 and over-clustering? #409

DemetrisS opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #595

Comments

@DemetrisS
Copy link

Hello

I am using KS3 with data from a 24Ch linear probe (Uprobe) - I am ending with >120 clusters (some cases >200) with around ~50% of them classified as 'good' - this seems rather high for the number of channels and can require a fair bit of manual merging afterwards.

I have tried the suggestions from issue #67 - changing "ops.Nfilt" and AUCsplit. I have played around by using a wide range of values from 0.5 to 0.99 for the AUCsplit but this has very little effect on cluster numbers.

I am not sure if this is related, but in order to get KS3 to work I had to set the "ops.nblocks" in the config file to zero.

Any advice/suggestions would be most welcome.

Many thanks
D

@JonathanAMichaels
Copy link

I don't believe the AUCsplit does anything in KS3. Making nblock=0 means no drift correction is taking place.
One possibility is to manually change the thresholds for merging in find_merges. Merging clusters with similar templates here could save you time later.

@DemetrisS
Copy link
Author

Many thanks for your suggestion - will give it a go.

Best,
D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants