Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Be careful with Bminer Equihash miner #1127

Closed
borzaka opened this issue Jan 28, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Be careful with Bminer Equihash miner #1127

borzaka opened this issue Jan 28, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@borzaka
Copy link

borzaka commented Jan 28, 2018

Be careful with Bminer. There is a possibility that this is a scam miner;

It's already in MPM: Add Bminer 5.0.0 für NVIDIA

@fonyo
Copy link
Member

fonyo commented Jan 28, 2018

We should only include miners that are at least 2-3 months old.

@f3rs3n
Copy link

f3rs3n commented Jan 28, 2018

I've taken the risk and tried it, 48 hours no-stop running right now, no crash and sol/s much more stable and 5% higher than dstm (even with -nofee that disable some optimizations). On the pool side, earning seem to be what it should.

@aloth
Copy link

aloth commented Jan 29, 2018

To get this really fixed, it would help if MPM reads out the actual hashrate on the pool, instead of the hashrate reported by the mining software. Comparing these would be much more accurate!

@UselessGuru
Copy link
Contributor

instead of the hashrate reported by the mining software. Comparing these would be much more accurate!

The pool does not have any idea of the miners hash rate, it just sees the number of found shares. From there the pool tries to extrapolate a hash rate based on the current difficulty.
The hash rate as reported by the pool will become more stable over time, but it will take a few minutes until we find get a reliable value.

@borzaka
Copy link
Author

borzaka commented Feb 10, 2018

It's still in MPM, consider remove it. There are many problems with this miner.

Very impressive higher sols with Bminer but how come the number of shares would be less than EWBF and DSTM?

Somtimes even crashes on "GPU hang" but running a EWBF miner works fine...

Currently i'm having 6402 accepted and 24 rejected for 21 hour period, you can do the math to see percentage wise. But i dont see higher rejected shares than other miners software.

One stability issue I had was that bminer appeared to be running normally, but hashrate at the pool dropped to zero like it was disconnected; this went on for about an hour before I noticed it.

[...]

Source: official bitcointalk.org forum

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants