New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Be careful with Bminer Equihash miner #1127
Comments
We should only include miners that are at least 2-3 months old. |
I've taken the risk and tried it, 48 hours no-stop running right now, no crash and sol/s much more stable and 5% higher than dstm (even with -nofee that disable some optimizations). On the pool side, earning seem to be what it should. |
To get this really fixed, it would help if MPM reads out the actual hashrate on the pool, instead of the hashrate reported by the mining software. Comparing these would be much more accurate! |
The pool does not have any idea of the miners hash rate, it just sees the number of found shares. From there the pool tries to extrapolate a hash rate based on the current difficulty. |
It's still in MPM, consider remove it. There are many problems with this miner.
[...] Source: official bitcointalk.org forum |
Just found some fair test result from bitcointalk, The test shows bminer is a clear winner 5% on the plus. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2519271.msg32329006#msg32329006 |
Be careful with Bminer. There is a possibility that this is a scam miner;
It's already in MPM: Add Bminer 5.0.0 für NVIDIA
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: