You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed there is a breaking change in v2.3-RC2, in vehicle_types.json, name in the conditional requirement of the new field "default_pricing_plan_id":
“REQUIRED if both system_pricing_plans.json and vehicle_types.json are defined.”
We are unable to complete implementation of this release candidate until this is solved.
Please describe some potential solutions you have considered (even if they aren’t related to GBFS).
The field should be made optional, and a conditional requirement can be added in v3.
Is your potential solution a breaking change?
Yes
No
Unsure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for Flagging this @testower - I'm updating the release candidate, should be completed sometime on Monday 3/28. I'll update this issue when the corrected release candidate is ready.
As raised in slack earlier in the week.
What is the issue and why is it an issue?
I noticed there is a breaking change in v2.3-RC2, in vehicle_types.json, name in the conditional requirement of the new field "default_pricing_plan_id":
We are unable to complete implementation of this release candidate until this is solved.
Please describe some potential solutions you have considered (even if they aren’t related to GBFS).
The field should be made optional, and a conditional requirement can be added in v3.
Is your potential solution a breaking change?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: