MEV opportunity in forceTransmute

[boldgate0759]

Hi, when investigating the contracts of NAOS, I really appreciate your great work in designing this protocol.
However, I have an issue regarding the forceTransmute function in the Transmuter contract.

NAOS-Formation/contracts/Transmuter.sol

Line 254 in db3373b

function forceTransmute(address toTransmute) public runPhasedDistribution updateAccount(msg.sender) updateAccount(toTransmute) checkIfNewUser {

I can see that there is no access control on this forceTransmute function, and anyone can call it to obtain profits as tokensInBucket, which can be later withdrawn and claimed.
I understand that the purpose here is to incentive blockchain users to transmute some address which has over-filled and keep the protocol running smoothly.
However, any transaction from a normal/honest NAOS user who makes efforts to identify an over-filled address and call forceTransmut, trying to contribute to the NAOS community, making the protocol healthy, and hoping to get some additional rewards back.
But his/her transaction can be front-run by those front-running bots on the blockchain, taking away the rewards.
This would be a bad experience for honest users of NAOS.

Do you think this forceTransmute function will expose an MEV opportunity on the blockchain?