Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revisit PrimitiveType and None Name #473

Open
MJJoyce opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Revisit PrimitiveType and None Name #473

MJJoyce opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@MJJoyce
Copy link
Member

MJJoyce commented Dec 20, 2022

Revisit the PrimitiveType name and format handling in light of #472. Seems like it would be better for PrimitiveType to be very strict about what it requires for names. Additionally, a _format of None doesn't seem like it makes sense for PrimitiveType. That seems more like a hack to support the current poorly thought out inheritance structure.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MJJoyce