You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
from TAQA:
behind the scenes, these have different identifiers (different curies) - so UI can't merge.
Chris B: could be a mistake in NN, they should be synonymous, or they could be really different and people give them the same name. That would take some more work, could be a "conflation", etc.
MESH:D019274 should connect these two cliques together (since it is connected to UMLS:C0006050 in the first clique and is itself part of the second clique), so yup, it does look like a NodeNorm issue. Let me look into what's going wrong here.
I think the issue here is that we don't currently use MeSH identifiers when combining protein identifiers -- we only use NCIT, UMLS, UniProtKB and the protein ontology. I worry that doing that might overcombine concepts -- I'll discuss this with @cbizon and get back to you.
I think that's a valid concern. We should test it out. My guess (?) is that if we're ok merging w/ NCIT & UMLS, then MESH will probably be ok as well...
https://ui.test.transltr.io/results?l=&t=&q=c572dfd1-1a94-4074-bb5a-6bd0b27cc045
page 1 result with 30 evidence
page 2 result with 1 evidence
papers do not appear to overlap
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: