Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More evidence types, kinds, and metadata would be extremely valuable on edges. #46

Closed
TranslatorIssueCreator opened this issue Nov 25, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request EPC KP - data/attribute gap UI - display confusion on or overlooking information UI - feature request future enhancement identified by user UI - known issue user identified bug that is known and is planned to be fix

Comments

@TranslatorIssueCreator
Copy link

Type: Suggestion

URL: http://transltr-bma-ui-dev.ncats.io/results?loading=true

ARS PK: 221b25c9-6022-4ff5-85ca-7e48f0c52634

Steps to reproduce:

Screenshots:

@sierra-moxon sierra-moxon added enhancement New feature or request UI - display confusion on or overlooking information UI - feature request future enhancement identified by user UI - known issue user identified bug that is known and is planned to be fix labels Dec 1, 2022
@sierra-moxon sierra-moxon changed the title Relationships appear to have little to no metadata. Eg. a "treats" edge, when clicked on, shows nothing about where this edge came from. Some other "treats" edges appear to come from the literature, but are missing basic information (like year, the snippet, etc.). More evidence types, kinds, and metadata would be extremely valuable on edges. Dec 1, 2022
@sierra-moxon
Copy link
Member

(Captured from issue title before edits):
Relationships appear to have little to no metadata. Eg. a "treats" edge, when clicked on, shows nothing about where this edge came from.

Some other "treats" edges appear to come from the literature but are missing basic information (like year, the snippet, etc.)

  • add evidence metadata other than publications to "Evidence" display (starting with infores data potentially)
  • for evidence on edges that do contain publications, consistent metadata about the year of publication, the abstract, etc, would be helpful.

@Genomewide
Copy link

We are currently developing a template that would cover what we are looking for.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WMVwYK_u9vQ60F-aKfdCer27Y4Xm1X04/edit

Matt is doing some work on the categorization of EPC. However, the more descriptive text is what we would like to link to if possible.

We are also considering just having the link to the source of the data. However, it is currently not clear how to decern this for every edge.

@sierra-moxon
Copy link
Member

From TAQA:

  • link from infores type -> group is available
  • still need resources to declare their "primary knowledge source" vs. "original knowledge source"
  • please see Andy's presentation of EPC attributes
    • Need folks to update to use one "primary knowledge source"
    • Need folks to comply with the latest representation
    • "have evidence" - needs EPC standardization
    • UI can focus on the InformationResource attributes for now while we wait for EPC harmonization.
    • end of the day - if I see PKS = spoke, then tell UI what to do with it. infores is linked to the attributes that are available.
    • we need structured edge attributes.

@sierra-moxon
Copy link
Member

sierra-moxon commented Feb 16, 2023

Best would be:
for each infores and association type, we want a list of available EPC attributes that you can reliably show.
small first step, get the infores attributes on every edge in Translator. We need this to get on the architecture spreadsheet tracker.

@gprice1129
Copy link
Collaborator

Can we close this?

@sstemann
Copy link

@gprice1129 seems like from the UI side this is being handled. not sure @sierra-moxon if you need this ticket for ongoing modeling work?

@sierra-moxon
Copy link
Member

closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request EPC KP - data/attribute gap UI - display confusion on or overlooking information UI - feature request future enhancement identified by user UI - known issue user identified bug that is known and is planned to be fix
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants