Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NTR] Add absorbance #86

Open
StroemPhi opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #87
Open

[NTR] Add absorbance #86

StroemPhi opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #87
Assignees

Comments

@StroemPhi
Copy link
Member

StroemPhi commented Jun 21, 2023

Preferred term label

absorbance

Synonyms

Textual definition

A data item that quantifies the absorption of light by some material as the logarithm of the incident electromagnetic radiation power I0 (before absorption), divided by the transmitted electromagnetic radiation power I (after absorption). A = lg(I0/I) (dct:source https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook, http://purl.allotrope.org/ontologies/result#AFR_0001157, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorbance)

Link to CHARISMA Wiki equivalent

Absorbance

Suggested parent term

IAO:data item

Axiomatization

This needs to follow the design pattern that such data items are always about the physical characteristics of material entities, in this case, the characteristic of some material to absorb light. Hence we need to assert this relation in the form of the following SubclassOf axiom:
IAO:is about some PATO:absorption quality

Examples

Please provide a more detailed description that examplifies how the term is supposed to be used, in terms of what it is suppose to repesent (e.g. a concept or a relation).

Attribution

ORCID:0000-0002-1595-3213, ORCID:0000-0001-7694-5519

@StroemPhi
Copy link
Member Author

StroemPhi commented Jun 22, 2023

Changed the parent and definition after also reading the Wikipedia entry. I wouldn't consider it a measurement datum but rather only a data item, as I assume it is not measured directly but calculated from other measurements. What is also still an open question for me regarding the GoldBook definition, is whether we should additionally define attenuance as a child of absorbance to account for scattering effects?

Edit: according to @Zack-83 attenuance should not be considered a child of absorbance. I would thus ignore it for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant