Updated notes

NQRCore · Jul 29, 2011 · 4be85ca · 4be85ca
1 parent 21ee2d1
commit 4be85ca
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 15 additions and 7 deletions.
diff --git a/HELP b/HELP
@@ -8,12 +8,17 @@ moment.
   attempt called 'myfor' is almost identical to what Whiteknight
   used in his matrixy project.  I just can't figure it out; the
   body of the loop isn't accessing the parameter.  If you are
-  interested, I can provide a simple example.
+  interested, I can provide a simple example.  There may be
+  a recent hint attached to my blog entry (see below)
 
 2. Even once this is solved, I think the loop behavior is not as
-desired.  I blogged about this, and it may not be the loop behavior,
-but an issue with handling of objects and assignments.
+  desired.  I blogged about this, and it may not be the loop behavior,
+  but an issue with handling of objects and assignments.
 
   http://www.parrot.org/content/funny-behavior-squaak-loop
 
-
+3. I expect some subtle grammar issues... print(sort(a)[0]) does
+  not seem to work as desired, for example, and this is almost
+  definitely a parser issue.  More testing is needed, and I may
+  have made some changes to <primary>, etc... that are getting in
+  the way, here.
diff --git a/README.pod b/README.pod
@@ -51,6 +51,6 @@ To run in batch mode (e.g. from a script):
 Have a glance at F<t/00-sanity.t>, and realize that only vectors are
 supported (and imperfectly so) as of late July, 2011.  For example,
 indexing starts at 0, not 1.  And the bracket operator currently only
-has a chance of working for single-element get/set operations.
+has a chance of working properly for single-element get/set operations.
 
 
diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
@@ -4,10 +4,13 @@
 Added additional functions (like min, max, log, exp...) and
 tests; implemented ResizableStringArray and did minor testing.
 
-Have some GSL problems for anything with integer arrays for some
-reasons.  Need to test with standalone C code sooner rather than
+I have some GSL problems for anything with integer arrays for some
+reasons; I need to test with standalone C code sooner rather than
 later.
 
+See 7/26 comment on properly dispatching forget [] operations -- a
+fairly high priority at this point.
+
 ----------
 2011-7-27: