Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Output:Table:Monthly "Invalid/Undefined" meter caused by similarly named custom meters #5121

Closed
ejhw opened this issue Aug 18, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available

Comments

@ejhw
Copy link

ejhw commented Aug 18, 2015

Some custom meters are not properly read by Output:Table:Monthly reports (they are labeled "Invalid/Undefined"). This is somehow dependent on the name of the custom meter and seems to happen with custom meters with similar names.

8.3 defect file illustrating issue: https://gist.github.com/ejhw/87a6a794b50ead78dcc3

cc @nmerket

@JasonGlazer JasonGlazer self-assigned this Sep 24, 2015
@mjwitte mjwitte added SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority labels Mar 9, 2016
@mjwitte mjwitte added this to the EnergyPlus 8.5.0 milestone Mar 9, 2016
@JasonGlazer
Copy link
Contributor

@ejhw I ran your example file in 8.3 and it reproduced the issue you described but when I transitioned it to 8.4 it no longer showed the two variables as Invalid/Undefined but with the units of [J] and values in the columns. I assume this is fixed and I am closing the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants