Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide auto-sizing capabilities for ground heat exchange systems #6561

Open
aaron-boranian opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
MigratedFromUserVoice Feature request was migrated from uservoice website NewFeatureRequest This "issue" is a new feature request, not a defect report

Comments

@aaron-boranian
Copy link
Contributor

GSHP sizing is currently not available. I would like to see this allowed for GroundHeatExchanger:Vertical. Some version could also be implemented for GroundHeatExchanger:Pond, GroundHeatExchanger:Surface, GroundHeatExchanger:HorizontalTrench, GroundHeatExchanger:Slinky.

Using the example of GroundHeatExchanger:Vertical, the following fields should be autosizable:

*design flow rate
*number of bore holes

Bore hole length, radius, and ground properties would still need to be defined.

Migrated from UserVoice

@aaron-boranian aaron-boranian added the NewFeature Includes code to add a new feature to EnergyPlus label Mar 21, 2018
@jasondegraw jasondegraw added MigratedFromUserVoice Feature request was migrated from uservoice website NewFeatureRequest This "issue" is a new feature request, not a defect report and removed NewFeature Includes code to add a new feature to EnergyPlus labels Apr 4, 2018
@j-c-cook
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is related to Issue 6651. A related PR seeks to provide EnergyPlus with enhanced g-function calculation (both more accurate and faster).

Auto-sizing a GSHP may need to include both selection and sizing of a field. The following is a proposed new input that would be required:

  • Acceptable length x width x height (field geometry)
    • Note: if this were not required, then the ideal situation would be to make a line of boreholes spaced far enough to make thermal interference essentially 0. There must be some kind of land constraint. This could simply be a maximum ratio of x:y, where 1:1 could force a square.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
MigratedFromUserVoice Feature request was migrated from uservoice website NewFeatureRequest This "issue" is a new feature request, not a defect report
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants